Bitcoin

Ethereum ETFs Are Not Like Bitcoin ETFs (So Far)

2 Mins read

A few months after the SEC gave the initial green light, the spot Ethereum ETFs officially hit the ground last Tuesday.

However, the immediate results have been quite underwhelming, and one can’t help but compare them to the spot Bitcoin ETF launch in January this year.

ETH ETFs Vs. BTC ETFs

CryptoPotato reported earlier this week that the nine spot Ethereum ETFs had a solid first day, gathering more than $106 million in net flows. As expected, the converted Grayscale fund (ETHE) saw substantial withdrawals of almost $500 million, but the flows toward the rest (especially ETHA and ETHW) managed to alleviate the pain.

However, the following three days were quite different as the trend quickly changed. Instead of overall inflows, the daily numbers turned red, with $133.3 million taken out on July 24, $152.4 million withdrawn on July 25, and $162.7 million pulled out on July 26.

It is a worrying trend since the outflows are actually growing. Grayscale’s ETHE lost $326.9 million, $346.2 million, and $356.3 million, respectively, in those three days.

However, the demand for the remaining products, even for BlackRock’s ETHA and Fidelity’s FETH, has been diminishing, and they were unable to make it up for the massive withdrawals from ETHE. As such, the numbers after the first four days of trading show $341.8 million taken out of the spot Ethereum ETFs.

There’s a stark contrast compared to the first four days of spot Bitcoin ETFs. The launch date saw more than $650 million in inflows, the second $203 million, and the fourth $453.8 million. Minor outflows were seen only on the third day ($52.7 million). The net flows in total were close to $1.260 billion in just four days, highlighting the enormous difference compared to the Ethereum ETFs.

What About Price Performances?

Although the difference in demand for the two largest cryptocurrencies is more than evident (for now, at least), the price performances of the underlying assets for the first several days of trading after the launch of their respective ETFs have been unexpected.

With more than $1.250 billion entering the BTC ecosystem, one could imagine that bitcoin’s price would be on a tear. But, they will be wrong. The cryptocurrency skyrocketed from $45,000 to $49,000 after the ETFs hit the markets on January 11, but slumped to $41,300 by the fourth day.

Bitcoin/Price/Chart 27.07.2024. Source: TradingView
Bitcoin/Price/Chart 27.07.2024. Source: TradingView

ETH, on the other hand, began with a price dump from $3,500 to $3,000, which was somewhat anticipated given the outflows, but bounced off and currently sits close to $3,300. As such, ether is down by just 6.5% now, despite the substantial outflows, while BTC plummeted by 16% even though the ETFs were a massive success in their early days.

Ethereum/Price/Chart 27.07.2024. Source: TradingView
Ethereum/Price/Chart 27.07.2024. Source: TradingView
SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER 2024 at BYDFi Exchange: Up to $2,888 welcome reward, use this link to register and open a 100 USDT-M position for free!


Source link

Related posts
Bitcoin

Toncoin Now #1 Crypto Ahead Of BTC & ETH In This Metric

2 Mins read
On-chain data shows that Toncoin (TON) has recently become the number one cryptocurrency in this network activity-related indicator. Toncoin Has Seen A…
Bitcoin

Experts Warning Of Bitcoin Resistance Ahead Of Fed Decision, Ethereum Remains Range Bound, GoodEgg Joins 13,000% Rally Club

2 Mins read
Este artículo también está disponible en español. As the cryptocurrency market braces for the next Federal Reserve decision, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum…
Bitcoin

Bitget Reports 1,600% Surge in African Users

1 Mins read
Bitget has seen a significant increase in African users, driven by factors like copy trading popularity and the growth of the TON…

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *